AGENT-1473: add InternalReleaseImageDegraded state type for MachineConfigNodeStatus Conditions field#2777
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@andfasano: This pull request references AGENT-1473 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Hello @andfasano! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (12)
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change introduces support for a new machine configuration node condition type called ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.11.3)Error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "kubeapilinter": tools/_output/bin/kube-api-linter.so, plugin: not implemented Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| // +kubebuilder:subresource:status | ||
| // +openshift:api-approved.openshift.io=https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2255 | ||
| // +openshift:file-pattern=cvoRunLevel=0000_80,operatorName=machine-config,operatorOrdering=01 | ||
| // +openshift:enable:FeatureGate=MachineConfigNodes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We removed this in #2715 . Did you mean to try to attach the NoRegistryClusterInstall FG?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤔 Interesting, I didn't notice that it was automatically added when I ran the make update command
…atus Conditions field This value will be used to indicate the availability or not of the node local InternalReleaseImage registry
0e4a016 to
458cdaf
Compare
|
@andfasano: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Should be fine as is. The condition should be gated in the MCO code itself right, so this change should be safe. |
This value will be used to indicate the availability or not of the node local InternalReleaseImage registry.
Related to #2611